xajax PHP Class Library - The easiest way to develop asynchronous Ajax applications with PHP
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
OK folks, 0.5 Beta 1 is out in the wild, so we look forward to hearing your feedback and ideas. Please post your 0.5-specific issues, upgrade questions, etc. in this thread so we don't clog up the boards.
Thanks!
Jared
Allright, i have put it on my CMS, seems to work well.
Last edited by Anthor (2006-10-03 9:05:01 PM)
Same here, so far, so good.
And for the people crying wolf about chancing/converting a existing project, just run a maybe a few dozen mass converts on the function names, and most of your project is converted in maybe 10 min time. Most of it are just namechanges, that you can convert in a mass search & replace.
Back to the project. Lets see if i can break xajax 
Any major changes that i should implement in my already written code?
Not really, mostly a few name changes like "->addScript" becoming "->script", well, drop the "add" on everything. The return code does not need the XLM part, etc ... You will see when you relink to the 5.0 script. When a error pops up, just look up the function in the examples for the new correct write method, and do a mass search & replace. Depending on how big your scripts are, you need to do it maybe a dozen times for most common functions, and for your init settings that now uses the flag function.
Like i said, took me 10min to convert my current project, and a few min to fix any change i missed after. There is no real chance in the function vars etc, so its mostly a major search & rename job without breaking the project.
The magic_quotes_gpc stripslashes from array bug is still in the code
Looking in the xajaxDefaultRequestProcessorPlugin.inc.php file, it doesnt look to be fixed( line 400)
From my other post:
http://community.xajaxproject.org/viewtopic.php?id=1819
Happy to tell that I'm proudly running xajax 0.5 b1, only 5 min to rename the old function names and I was done
BTW does anybody know how to include the scriptaculous framework in xajax using the new plugin engine?
BTW does anybody know how to include the scriptaculous framework in xajax using the new plugin engine?
something i'd wish to know too
and i've converted some of my small projects to 0.5beta ... seems to work well
I'm still having the problem mentioned in this topic: http://community.xajaxproject.org/viewtopic.php?id=1956
BTW does anybody know how to include the scriptaculous framework in xajax using the new plugin engine?
need this information too 
i convert my actually project at the moment from 0.2.4 to 0.5
yeah i am asking myself how to do that too, since there are so many new functions, which one do you use to implement a plugin like scriptaculous with includeScript() and registerFunction()???? maybe somebody can show a little example
I'm sorry I didn't point this out earlier, but Beta 1 was not a "bug fix" release compared with 0.2.4. There are a few improvements, but it's likely that most outstanding problems from 0.2.4 are still there, and indeed there are most likely new bugs as well. Now, that being said, please let us know what problems you do find even if they are old, because that's most helpful. All I'm saying is don't be surprised to find them.
How is the Comet/Streaming support coming along in 0.5? Been looking forward to this and have several places I'd like to use it. Still planned?
Thanks and great work.
- Russell
Is this version stable enough to use or only intented for testing by users of previous versions? I never worked with (x)ajax before...
Is the documention updated for the new version?
Things i like to to with ajax is for example autocompletion (think i need scriptaculous for this one) and filling combo-box options and off course changing innerHtml etc...
ikki, its stable.
Also, for the things you talk about, take a look in the example & test files. Also, the docs of the 2.x branch are almost the same as the 5.x branch ( expect the enhanced or dare i say, simplified naming ).
What about the previous page button?? And file upload? And this synchronizing stuff, like comet?
Is it included?
What about the previous page button?? And file upload? And this synchronizing stuff, like comet?
Is it included?
Those are all going to be developed as plugins. We needed to get the base architecture in place before we started adding a bunch of major feature enhancements on top. So the short answer to your question is no, but the long answer is that we'll try to get some or all of this stuff in place for Beta 2, which is due out soon-ish.
Jared
Hi Jared,
...we'll try to get some or all of this stuff in place for Beta 2, which is due out soon-ish.
What about JavaScript part for plugins functionality? Beta 2 also? ;-) Thank You!
What is "legacy.inc.php" for, and why are the php not well-closed at the last line?
Take a look at the upgrade information in the wiki. legacy.inc.php contains the legacyXajax class, a bridge from the old methods to the new methods in the Xajax class.
Last edited by Cyberwolf (2006-10-06 7:24:58 AM)
Thanks. Im still wondering why the file has no php closing brackets. (?>)
I've started a new project based on 0.5 beta1 and now i think i made a mistake. It took me about 2 hours to upgrade the sources.
Now i see that a new "xajax->call()" (xajaxResponse->addScriptCall();) doesn't work as it worked before.
I don't have argument values on js side (for windows-1251 encoding at least).
Just read somewhere here that "Old functionality of 0.2.4 is ok in 0.5"
Continue working on solving the issue.
Tested the simpliest piece of code. Result: js function sin't called at all:
$objResponse->call("edit_ed_text",'asd','asd');
...
{
alert('edit_ed_text:');
// var oEditor = FCKeditorAPI.GetInstance(editor_name);
// oEditor.SetHTML( value ) ;
return false;
}
Last edited by mstar (2006-10-06 10:29:18 AM)
mstar, I think this is related to the problem I mentioned some replies earlier: http://community.xajaxproject.org/viewtopic.php?id=1956
mstar, I think this is related to the problem I mentioned some replies earlier
Yes. That's it.
Just skipped your post reading the forum.
PHP doesn't actually require an ending ?>. So for PHP files that only contain PHP code, they can be left out, which some folks do these days, including me.
Posts [ 1 to 25 of 57 ]
Currently used extensions: pun_repository. Copyright © 2008 PunBB
[ Generated in 0.980 seconds, 7 queries executed ]